News Stories

AT&T To Cut Hundreds Of U.S. Tech Jobs
Information Week
Consumer and Public Interest Groups Urge FCC to Fight for Consumers, not AT&T Executives
Woman paid thousands to rent rotary phone
Associated Press
Rules change lets AT&T avoid disclosure requirements
San Francisco Chronicle
AT&T charges elderly woman thousands for phone rental
Associated Press
FCC Asks AT&T About Hewlett-Packard Leak
Associated Press
BellSouth to close Paducah call center
Associated Press
BellSouth Seeks More Rate Power
Raleigh News & Observer
Online data breach hits AT&T customers
Computer Week
FCC queries high-speed Internet fee
USA TODAY
FCC Questions DSL Customer Fees
Wall Street Journal
'NO SERVICE AVAILABLE' HAUNTING PRICEVILLE
The Decatur Daily
Cingular Employee Blogs on Customer Service
Washington Post
Verizon and BellSouth DSL Users Won't See Lower Bills as Fee Ends
Wall Street Journal
Wiretap Ruling Threatens Telecoms
Business Week
Bell Foes Create Web Site To Fight 'Merger Monster'
National Journal Technology Daily
Beware the Merger Monster
Multichannel News
Diverse Groups Oppose Merger, Seek Divestiture of Spectrum Licenses
BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS
Past Mergers Put Pressure on AT&T-BellSouth Deal
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Judge To Review Phone Merger Pacts
WALL STREET JOURNAL - DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
AT&T, BellSouth Shares Slip After Hearing
HOUSTON CHRONICLE
Quick Approval of Phone Deals Uncertain
NEW YORK TIMES
AT&T to Pay $550,000 to Settle Privacy Cases
BLOOMBERG NEW
AT&T to Pay $550,000 to End 2 Regulatory Matters
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
The Resurrection of AT&T
TECHNOLOGY DAILY
Supreme Court Judge to Review Case Antitrust Case Against Phone Companies
NEW YORK TIMES
Supreme Court to Review Telecoms Antitrust Case
NEW YORK TIMES-REUTERS
Privacy Rules Change for AT&T Net Service
CLEVELAND PLAIN DEALER
Privacy Advocates Slam AT&T on Customer Records
NEW YORK TIMES-REUTERS
AT&T Revises Privacy Policy, Says Owns Customer Data
REUTERS
AT&T Alters Policy
BUSINESS WEEK
BellSouth Says AT&T Merger Won't Recreate Ma Bell
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
Divestiture Urged: Opponents See Wireless Broadband Suffering Under AT&T-BellSouth Merger
COMMUNICATIONS DAILY
Foes of AT&T Merger with BellSouth Detail Concerns
COMMUNICATIONS DAILY
Consumer Groups Look to Squash AT&T/BellSouth Deal
REUTERS
Privacy Rules Change for AT&T Net Service

Henry J. Gomez

June 23, 2006

A new policy that takes effect today at AT&T could mean less privacy for many Web surfers.

The change at the nation's top telephone company, which has more than 7 million Internet service subscribers, raises a new question: Who really owns your confidential data?

AT&T's revised privacy policy, which affects only its Internet customers and future subscribers to a soon-to-launch video service, explicitly classifies personal account information as "business records" that are owned by the San Antonio telecommunications giant.

"As such," the new policy states, "AT&T may disclose such records to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process."

Critics argue that the revisions are too broad and give AT&T more latitude to share data with the federal government. Some also question the timing of the changes.

The policy takes effect on the same day that oral arguments are scheduled on the federal government's motion to dismiss a class-action suit against AT&T. The suit accuses AT&T of illegally working with the National Security Agency in support of a domestic spying program.

AT&T spokeswoman Tiffany Nels said the company had been working on the privacy policy update for several months. The revisions, she said, are simply a result of the company's recent merger with SBC -- which had a slightly different policy -- and the imminent roll-out of video service that is intended to compete with cable providers.

"For AT&T Internet users, there really are no significant changes," Nels said.

Nels said the new policy is a "more plain-English approach to stating what information we collect and the way we use it. It's all the same and consistent with AT&T's long-standing privacy policy."

But there are some notable changes.

The previous policy, which had been in effect since September 2004, said AT&T (then known as SBC) could share personal information specifically when responding to "subpoenas, court orders or other legal process, to the extent required and/or permitted by law."

The new policy adds to that statement by declaring that AT&T "may also use your information in order to investigate, prevent, or take action regarding illegal activities, suspected fraud" and "situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person."

Ray Everett-Church, a Silicon Valley privacy analyst and co-author of the book "Internet Privacy for Dummies," said the new language makes AT&T's privacy policy "even more vague" to the point where the company might not even need a court order to share data.

"The AT&T privacy policy has no business being a privacy policy," Everett-Church said.

Paul Stephens, a policy analyst for the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse in San Diego, said that while there was a lot of confusion about its revisions, he thinks AT&T made one thing clear: It owns customers' personal information and can do with it what it wants.

"We feel it's absolutely outrageous," Stephens said. Nels said AT&T began e-mailing notices of the policy change to Internet customers on Sunday. According to the document, users "must agree to this policy" as a condition for service. Nels said Internet subscribers will consent by continuing to use the service. Those who disagree should cancel their AT&T Internet accounts and switch to another provider.

As for AT&T's imminent broadband video service, known as Project Lightspeed, subscribers would be asked to sign the privacy policy upon installation, Nels said. But privacy analysts also are quibbling about language regarding the company's plans to monitor viewing habits.

Nels said AT&T will be no more intrusive than TiVo, the gadget that not only records your favorite shows but also your personal preferences based on what you watch and how often.

"Of course," said Stephens of the Policy Rights Clearinghouse, "a lot of people find TiVo objectionable. People refuse to use TiVo because of the tracking they do." But telecommunications industry analyst Gary Arlen, president of Arlen Communications Inc. in Bethesda, Md., suggested that the privacy concerns might be overblown.

"This is the digital era," Arlen said. "Data about you is everywhere. At least AT&T is telling you they've got it."


WHAT THE MERGER MEANS TO YOU

© 2006